|
The project began in the early 1980's,
when minke research around the San Juan Islands,
Washington was started by Eleanor Dorsey. This was as a behavioural
study based on the ability to recognize individuals. Once this was
accomplished, individual specific behaviors could be identified
and minimum population estimates could be made. The
success of this work led us to similar studies in the Monterey
Bay area, California and Johnstone Strait, British Columbia.
These different areas provided other populations for a comparative
approach to study minke whales in areas with different predominant
ecological processes. Photo identification
catalogues Using photographic
techniques to recognize individual whales, catalogues were created
for the 3 study areas. Several features were used to
identify these minke whales, such as notches in the dorsal fin,
scars on the body, unusual fin shape and lateral body pigmentation.
Some of the scars on the body of the whales are oval and white,
thought to be caused by parasitic lampreys.
|

|

|
|
Photographs to show identifying features useful for photo identification |
So once a whale is identified, subsequent
"recapture" of that individual during a later encounter
sheds some light on the movements and distribution of that
individual.
Some of the individuals were seen multiple times over the
course of a summer field season, and from year to year. This "faithfulness" to an area is called site-fidelity. These studies
revealed that only a few
individuals were identified, less
than about 60 overall, throughout the 3 study areas. There
were no matches of individuals between areas, suggesting
populations were separate, at least as feeding aggregations. Most field effort, and thus more individuals were
identified around the San Juan Islands. A total of 30
individual minkes whales were catalogued over 11 years of study
around the San Juan Islands. Distribution
of minke whales around the San Juan Islands In the
1980's minke whales were found in three areas of concentration
around the San Juan Islands. These three areas A, B and C are
shown in the map below.
Site-fidelity makes sense for a
predator looking for ephemeral, or patchy resources such as fish
shoals. The whales get to
know an area, and increase the chances of finding food by
repeatedly searching areas where an individual has previously
found food.
However, by the 1990's 2 of these areas
were abandoned, and whales were only found in the Strait of Juan
de Fuca (Area C), despite continued search efforts in areas A
and B. This coincided with a general decline of herring
associated with disturbance of adjacent herring spawning
grounds. Also, we noted an overall qualitative change in the
number of sea birds.
In 2005, we found whales foraging in all 3 areas again, and the number of birds was also much higher
than in recent years. To read more about this please go to
Current Research.
Exclusive
adjoining ranges
Sixteen whales were identified whales in 1980.
The distribution of these individuals were very interesting, and
unexpected. Each whale favoured one of the areas, or " exclusive adjoining
ranges." Each area was shared by up to at
least seven minke whales, with only two instances of crossover
between the areas in 70 sightings. Feeding was observed in all three
areas, and the whales within each area appeared most of the time
to be acting independently of one another. No calves were seen,
and no overt acts of territorial defence were observed. This is
the first known report in baleen whales of small-scale
non-overlapping ranges.
Feeding behavior
We also studied the feeding techniques of 23 individually
identified minke whales in the inland waters of Washington State
and reported that each whale tended to specialize in one of two
feeding techniques, lunge feeding or bird-associated
feeding. Bird-associated feeding involved the whale exploiting
schools of fish fry concentrated by birds.
Alcids including rhinocerous aucklets, murres and pigeon
guillemots and other diving birds such as cormorants pursue fish from below.
Predatory fish such as salmon and dogfish sharks concentrate and
drive prey to the surface. Gulls feed from the surface and mark
the spot. Minke whales are then seen
surfacing at the site where the birds are feeding.
Lunge feeding
is described as the whale actively concentrating the prey against
the air/water interface with no birds involved and then lunging
through the fish with its mouth open. This occurs in deep
basin areas or at the edge of tide rips.
Dead fish and scales were collected at the site of observed feeding. Juvenile
Pacific herring were found where lunge feeding had taken place and
juvenile Pacific herring and juvenile sandlance were
found on separate occasions after bird-associated feeding had
taken place.
As mentioned above, individual whales tended
to feed in specific areas and return to these areas throughout the
season and from year to year. The techniques were specific to a certain site implying that the whales specialised on
a technique depending on the area that they return to annually.
This suggests that individuals know area-specific environmental
conditions, and the spatial and temporal distribution of prey
within that area. The areas where lunge feeding mainly occurred consisted of open
basins bounded at one side by a shallow bay and by a steep slope
at the other. The area where most bird-associated feeding occurs
consisted of shallow banks bounded by deep water with direct
oceanic influence through the Strait of Juan de Fuca.
Minke whale feeding strategies depend
upon variations in the distribution of prey in a complex and
patchy environment. Bird-associated feeding
occurs when the prey is concentrated and transitory in its
occurrence usually along the edge of banks and upwelling areas. Whereas lunge feeding occurs when the prey is patchy
but predictable in locality, i.e. spawning grounds of fish, and is
abundant every year. Thus, it is suggested that topography, and the
hydrographic influences that this creates, affects the
distribution of fish fry or their planktonic prey and that this in
turn determines the feeding techniques most appropriate to exploit
the prey.
Distribution in the
Monterey Bay Area
Minke whales in this
area had a different distribution pattern, likely dictated by the
environment. The edge of the continental shelf was relatively
close to shore, less than 15km in most places, and closer in
others. Thus minke whales were relatively close to shore, often at
the edge of kelp beds, where they fed on schools of juvenile
rockfish (Sebastes spp).
Minke whales were
initially thought to be quite numerous, based upon sightings. We
identified only a few individuals in the area, but their movement
patterns were what suggested the large population size. Sightings
were made from shore. When we followed a minke whale, it moved
alongshore, back and forth along the coast. Therefore, the large
number of sightings were actually sightings of a few individuals
moving back and forth in front of the sightings platform. Instead
of saying “there’s one...there’s one…there’s one” over
and over, they should have said “there’s Springsteen…
there’s Springsteen again… there’s Springsteen again” over
and over.
The Minke Whale Project
continues!
The work in the San Juan Islands has continued and
there have been a number of significant findings. To read more about this please go to
Current Research.
|